Select Page

Stocks fall sharply on worries about new Chinese lockdowns.

Stocks fall sharply on worries about new Chinese lockdowns.

Image

Credit…Jade Gao/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Global stocks fell on Monday on fears that a coronavirus outbreak in Beijing could lead to broader lockdowns in China, which would have a negative effect on the world economy. Commodities like oil also fell in anticipation that stringent new restrictions would depress growth and exports in the world’s second-largest economy.

Wall Street was pointed toward a drop when trading begins, following steep declines in Asian and European stock indexes. The Shanghai composite plummeted 5.1 percent, the index’s biggest daily decline since February 2020, and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong lost 3.7 percent. The tightly controlled Chinese currency, the renminbi, also fell 1 percent versus the U.S. dollar, extending recent losses.

The wave of selling continued in Europe, where the Stoxx Europe 600 lost 2.1 percent. Germany’s DAX was 1.7 percent lower.

Oil prices were down about 4 percent, with Brent crude trading at $102 a barrel, after reaching nearly $115 a week ago. West Texas Intermediate futures were trading at $97.80 a barrel.

The war in Ukraine has reverberated through the global economy, pushing inflation to levels not seen in decades, prompting central banks to raise interest rates. But the latest worries come from China, where the central government has relied on lockdowns of major population and manufacturing areas, in pursuit of the Communist Party leader Xi Jinping’s “zero Covid” strategy of eliminating infections.

The Beijing government reported on Monday that 70 coronavirus cases had been found in city since Friday. The district with the highest case numbers ordered all 3.5 million residents to take coronavirus tests in the coming days. In other cities, mass testing has sometimes been a prelude to stringent lockdowns, like the four-week one in Shanghai.

The yield on 10-year Treasuries was down six basis points, to about 2.82 percent, another sign of jitters about economic growth.

Image

Credit…Jim Wilson/The New York Times

Twitter is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk, two people with knowledge of the situation said, a move that would unite the world’s richest man with the influential social networking service. An agreement could be announced as soon as Monday, the people told The Times’s Lauren Hirsch, Mike Isaac and Katie Conger.

Twitter’s board was negotiating with Mr. Musk into Monday over his unsolicited bid to buy the company, after he began lining up $46.5 billion in financing for the offer last week, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss confidential information. The two sides were talking about details including a timeline to close any potential deal and any fees that would be paid if an agreement were signed and then fell apart, they said.

The discussions followed a Twitter board meeting on Sunday morning to discuss Mr. Musk’s offer, the people said. Obtaining commitments for the financing was a turning point for how the board viewed Mr. Musk’s bid of $54.20 a share, enabling the company’s 11 board members to seriously consider his offer, the people said.

An agreement is not yet final and may still fall apart, but what had initially seemed to be a highly improbable deal appeared to be nearing an endgame. The situation involving Twitter and Mr. Musk remains fluid and fast-moving, the people with knowledge of the situation said.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE →

Image

Credit…Krista Schlueter for The New York Times

The near-instant collapse of CNN+ amounted to one of the most spectacular media failures in years, a $300 million experiment that ended abruptly with layoffs in the offing and careers in disarray. The corporate tug of war over its fate exposed deep philosophical divides about the future of digital media, as executives struggle to navigate a rapidly changing marketplace where technology and consumer habits shift day to day. And it reflected the awkward regulatory dance of two media giants merging even as a high-profile project hurtled toward completion.

The Times’s John Koblin, Michael M. Grynbaum and Benjamin Mullin report on the sudden rise and fall of CNN+, based on interviews with a dozen people intimately familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity to share the details of sensitive conversations.

  • Discovery, run by David Zaslav for 15 years, had concerns about CNN+. Mr. Zaslav, the chief executive of the newly merged Warner Bros. Discovery, had experienced bad luck with single-topic streaming services as the head of Discovery, where niche platforms dedicated to cars, food and golf were costly and ended in failure.

  • But Discovery was constrained from directly guiding one of its streaming competitors until the deal closed. In late February and again in early March, Andrew Morse, CNN’s chief digital officer, asked if his team could share their vision for CNN+ with Discovery officials before the merger was complete. Both times, the requests were not granted. In transactions between major companies, executives are wary of running afoul of rules precluding “gun-jumping”: coordinating their business activities in the critical days before the deals close.

  • Despite the skepticism radiating from Discovery, Jason Kilar, the chief executive of WarnerMedia, did not consider scrapping the start of CNN+. He assumed that Discovery had fully understood when it agreed to the merger that WarnerMedia was readying an ambitious new digital CNN product.

  • Mr. Zaslav and his team were confounded. Discovery was poised to take over the company within weeks. Why not just delay? Still, aides to Mr. Zaslav admitted one advantage: They would get a look at CNN+ performance, akin to a movie’s opening-night box office.

  • Immediately after the merger closed on April 8, Discovery officials began asking for data on CNN+’s progress. They did not like what they saw. In a troubling sign, downloads for the service were waning, despite the big marketing push.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Tech company earnings: Technology giants including Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon and Apple are set to publish their financial performance reports for the first three months of the year. Tech stocks have been losing their ground as investors respond to the Federal Reserve’s plans to raise interest rates this year.

Consumer goods earnings: McDonald’s, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo will report their financial performance for the first quarter through March. These and several other companies have already announced price increases to offset the higher costs of production.

Automaker earnings: General Motors and Ford are expected to publish their earnings for the first quarter, a period when carmakers globally struggled with a shortage of computer chips. The shortage has led to production constrains, which have left dealers with reduced inventories of new vehicles.

  • Amazon union vote: Workers at an Amazon Staten Island sorting center will start a five-day vote on unionizing, and the results are set to be tallied on May 2. The vote comes after workers of Amazon’s JFK8 warehouse voted to unionize this month.

  • Warner Bros. Discovery: Economists will be looking for any indications on what led to the shutdown of CNN+, the entertainment conglomerate’s streaming service, a week after it launched.

  • Gross domestic product: The Bureau of Economic Analysis will publish data on the economic growth in the United States, which is expected to show a slowdown in the first three months of the year. Economists will be looking for details on how higher inflation is impeding consumers from spending and on the overall economy.

  • Twitter earnings: Investors will want to hear more about Elon Musk’s recent offer to buy the social media giant. Twitter responded by implementing a poison pill, which makes it harder for a prospective buyer to pursue the target company if the buyer accumulates shares above a certain point.

  • Southwest Airlines earnings: The airline is expected to report its earnings report for its first quarter, a week after its competitors American Airlines and United Airlines published optimistic results. Investors will want to see how Southwest’s fuel-hedging strategy has helped it offset rising fuel costs.

  • Oil company earnings: Exxon Mobil and Chevron will report their financial performance reports for the first three months of the year. The energy giants are expected to have benefited from soaring crude prices amid the Russian invasion in Ukraine, which led Western countries to impose oil bans on Russia.

Image

Credit…Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times

Liz Alderman

PARIS — Vowing to heal France’s “doubts and divisions,” President Emmanuel Macron is expected to turn quickly to tackling one of the key issues that spurred over 40 percent of voters to cast a ballot for the far-right candidate Marine Le Pen: an erosion in purchasing power and living standards that fueled resentment during his first term.

The French finance minister, Bruno Le Maire, vowed Monday during an interview on Europe 1 that Mr. Macron’s second term would be different. “We can’t forget the message they sent. We need to change our way of governing,” he said.

The euro rose briefly Monday on Mr. Macron’s victory, which was largely expected in financial markets and greeted with relief by European leaders who welcomed political continuity in one of Europe’s most powerful countries. Ms. Le Pen, who planned to pull back from European integration, was widely seen as a danger to E.U. unity.

One of Mr. Macron’s first priorities will be a “purchasing power package” he outlined during the campaign. It includes pushing through measures by summer to increase pensions, raise social subsidies for households strained by galloping inflation and offer tax breaks to encourage companies to give hefty cost-of-living bonuses.

Mr. Le Maire added that caps on energy prices that Mr. Macron put in place to combat soaring energy bills from Russia’s war in Ukraine would be maintained until the end of the year. That was an apparent concession to a proposal by Ms. Le Pen to lower value-added taxes on energy and gas to 5.5 percent, from 20 percent.

“There is a lot to do on inflation, on the economy,” Mr. Le Maire said.

Although Mr. Macron presided over economic growth and a sharp decline in unemployment, he was unable to ease growing inequality. If he wins a parliamentary majority in June’s legislative elections, he would have more freedom to move ahead with his economic program.

French labor unions welcomed Mr. Macron’s victory, but said that he needed to bridge France’s divide. They urged him to focus on social and economic issues that led people to vote for Ms. Le Pen — even as they called for nationwide demonstrations on May 1 to demand that Mr. Macron push increases in wages and pensions, delay plans to hike the retirement age and further emphasize environmental policy.

“The worst was avoided today. But nearly 42 percent of the votes for the far right mean that nothing can and should be as before,” Laurent Berger, secretary general of the C.F.D.T., one of France’s leading labor unions, wrote on Twitter on Sunday.

Solidaires, another big union, warned that the strength of the far right appeared to be growing, in part because of “antisocial policies” by French governments. Despite Mr. Macron’s win, the union said that he had “no popular legitimacy to apply antisocial reforms,” especially a plan to raise the retirement age to 64 or 65 to fund France’s national pension system (the current retirement age is 62).

Business lobbies were elated at Mr. Macron’s win, having warned that Ms. Le Pen’s ideas of wresting France away from Europe would do incalculable damage to the country and its economy. But they acknowledged that social unrest could flare again.

Mr. Macron’s first term was marked by mass demonstrations against his proposals to change the pension system, as well as the Yellow Vest movement, which brought millions of disenchanted workers out in protest at being left behind in the French economy.

“The president has before him the labors of Hercules, in that I believe the world has never been as unstable as we know,” said François Asselin, president of an industry group representing small and midsize businesses. “The question is going to be how to get as many people as possible to accept the reforms that the country needs, without there being blockages, because we need a country that works.”

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/04/25/business/economy-news-stocks-inflation