Select Page

Business Updates: Uber Says It’s Bouncing Back After Pandemic Slump

Image

Uber said that its passengers were returning and that Uber Eats had helped bring in business during spikes in coronavirus cases.
Credit…Mark Abramson for The New York Times

Uber said on Wednesday that growing revenue and returning passengers sent a strong signal that its business was bouncing back in the final three months of 2021 from the slowdown caused by the pandemic.

The quarter also provided another indication of how Uber’s fortunes rise and fall with its investments in other companies.

Uber’s revenue grew to $5.8 billion, an 83 percent increase from a year earlier, exceeding analyst expectations. The company also marked its second profitable quarter as a public company, earning $892 million largely from its investments in Grab, the Southeast Asian ride-hailing company that went public in December, and Aurora, the autonomous vehicle start-up.

Uber lost $968 million during the same period a year earlier and reported a loss of $2.4 billion in the third quarter of 2021 caused by its investment in Didi, the Chinese ride-hailing company.

Its investments in other ride-hailing companies would probably continue to cause fluctuation in its profits and losses, Uber said in its earnings report. Uber’s chief executive, Dara Khosrowshahi, said at a December analyst event that the company would hang on to some of its strategic investments but would eventually look to sell its stake in Didi.

Uber’s loss from operations for the quarter was $550 million, a 37 percent improvement from a year earlier.

Uber said it was attracting a growing number of users by relying on its food delivery business, Uber Eats, to bring in business during spikes in coronavirus cases, when its ride-hailing business declined. Uber reported 118 million users during the fourth quarter, a 27 percent increase from a year earlier.

“Our results demonstrate just how far we’ve come since the beginning of the pandemic,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said in a statement. “While the Omicron variant began to impact our business in late December, mobility is already starting to bounce back.”

The growth in users sets Uber apart from its primary rival in the United States, Lyft. In an earnings report on Tuesday, Lyft said it had 18,728 users during the fourth quarter, a 49 percent increase from a year earlier but a slight decrease from the third quarter. The modest decline in users showed that the winter wave of Omicron might have presented more challenges to Lyft’s business.

Still, Lyft said that its revenue had grown by 70 percent, to $969.9 million, and that its losses had improved to $258.6 million, a 43 percent change from a year earlier.

Analysts said Uber’s and Lyft’s businesses would most likely continue to fluctuate as travel was affected by the pandemic.

“It’s going to ebb and flow,” said Tom White, a senior research analyst with the financial firm D.A. Davidson. While Lyft’s business was tied to coronavirus conditions in North America, Uber could experience other issues because it operates around the world, he added.

Image

Credit… Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Jeanna Smialek

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has selected Susan M. Collins, a University of Michigan economist and administrator, as its new president — making her the first Black woman to lead a regional reserve bank in the Fed system’s 108-year history.

Ms. Collins, who is a provost and executive vice president for academic affairs at the university, will be one of 12 regional reserve bank presidents within the Fed system and will vote on monetary policy in 2022.

Ms. Collins identifies as Jamaican-American, and she will add to the diversity of the Fed at a moment when it is moving away from its heavily white and male makeup in the past.

Lisa Cook, a Michigan State University economist who is also a Black woman, has been nominated as a Fed governor but has yet to be confirmed. Raphael Bostic, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta president, was the first Black person ever to lead a reserve bank.

Ms. Collins will start July 1, the Boston Fed said in its release, which will plunge her into the policy discussion at a challenging moment. Officials are trying to combat rapid price increases without choking off a robust economic rebound from the pandemic. Joblessness has fallen swiftly and wages are rising, though not quite enough to overcome the burst of inflation as supply chain issues spur shortages.

“I look forward to helping the Bank and System pursue the Fed’s dual mandate from Congress — achieving price stability and maximum employment,” Ms. Collins said in the Boston Fed’s prepared release.

Four regional central banks rotate in and out of rotating voting positions each year, while the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and members of the seven-seat Board of Governors in Washington hold a constant vote on monetary policy.

The Fed is expected to raise interest rates, its main policy tool, several times this year to slow borrowing and spending, cooling off demand.

Ms. Collins has had a wide-ranging economic career, including as a visiting scholar at the International Monetary Fund and as a staff member at the Council of Economic Advisers during the George H.W. Bush administration. Most of her research has focused on international economics.

But she has at times spoken about monetary policy. In a 2015 article in The Detroit Free Press, she noted that it was difficult to be both reactive to incoming economic data and completely predictable. Locking in a preset pace of rate increases, she said, could set the market up for tumult if conditions changed.

“The Fed wants to avoid surprising the market,” she said in the article.

That could be relevant now, at a time when the Fed is trying to set policy against a virus-stricken and uncertain backdrop. Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, has emphasized that the central bank will be “humble” and “nimble.”

Ms. Collins was selected by directors on the Boston Fed’s board and approved by the Fed’s Board of Governors in Washington. Ms. Collins will replace Eric S. Rosengren, who retired as the Boston Fed’s president last year following a trading scandal, citing health concerns.

Ms. Collins has an undergraduate degree from Harvard University and a doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Image

Credit…Disney+

Brooks Barnes

LOS ANGELES — Disney+ added 11.8 million new subscribers worldwide in the most recent quarter to reach 129.8 million, handily beating analyst expectations, as growth at Hulu and ESPN+ pushed Disney’s portfolio of streaming services toward 200 million total subscribers.

The Walt Disney Company’s quarterly disclosure of subscriber numbers instantly eased investor concerns about slowing Disney+ growth. The service missed analyst projections in November. Disney shares rose 9 percent in after-hours trading to about $160. Disney’s theme parks also delivered blockbuster results, the Omicron variant be darned, in part because of a new paid line-skipping system.

Streaming continues to represent the greatest opportunity for growth in the entertainment business. But some of the froth has evaporated as services have proliferated, making it harder for companies to meet growth expectations and resulting in overwhelmed consumers: Some of the thrill of having thousands of shows and films at one’s fingertips is gone. Analysts have also worried that the boom that services enjoyed during the coronavirus pandemic will come to an end.

Last month, Netflix said it added 8.3 million subscribers in its most recent quarter, instead of the projected 8.5 million, and forecast a slowdown for the current quarter compared with a year earlier. Netflix shares cratered 20 percent, dragging down Disney and other media companies with them. Netflix has 222 million subscribers worldwide.

“There is a lot of concern in the market about streaming all of a sudden,” Michael Nathanson, a leading media analyst, said last week. “People are more negative than they have been.”

Mr. Nathanson added that Disney+ needed to offer more content for people who were not Marvel or “Star Wars” fans and who didn’t have children. Notably, one of the standout offerings on Disney+ in the most recent quarter was Peter Jackson’s documentary series “The Beatles: Get Back.” That offering alone drove 209,000 Disney+ sign-ups in its opening period (the day it was released and the two days after), according to Antenna, a research company.

Disney said it logged $4.7 billion in total streaming revenue in the most recent quarter, up 34 percent from a year earlier. Hulu, which Disney owns with Comcast, benefited from raising subscription prices. Nonetheless, Disney’s streaming division lost roughly $600 million — about 27 percent more than a year earlier — because of costs that included content production, marketing and technology infrastructure.

Operating profit at Disney Parks, Experiences and Products totaled $2.45 billion, compared with a loss of $119 million a year earlier, when some of Disney’s properties were closed because of the pandemic and others, including Walt Disney World, were capping daily attendance at 35 percent of capacity. Disney cited the return of its cruise line, albeit with limited capacity, as another reason for the division’s rebound.

Higher prices at Disney parks also helped, as did the introduction of a new digital tool called Genie+ that allows park visitors — for $15 at Disney World in Florida and $20 at Disneyland in California — to drastically shorten ride wait times.

Underscoring the importance of streaming growth to Disney’s future: Operating profit at the company’s largest division, broadcast and cable television, totaled $1.5 billion in the quarter, a 13 percent decline from $1.7 billion a year earlier. Disney attributed the decrease to higher content production and marketing costs and lower political advertising at local stations. The division includes ESPN, ABC, Disney Channel, FX, Freeform and National Geographic.

All told, Disney had $1.15 billion in profit in the quarter, compared with $29 million in the same quarter last year. When one-time items are excluded, per-share profit rose to $1.06, compared with 32 cents. Revenue was $21.82 billion, a 34 percent increase from $16.2 million a year earlier.

After a drawn-out farewell, Robert A. Iger, Disney’s previous chief executive and executive chairman, formally left the company at the end of last year, making Wednesday’s earnings report the solo debut for Bob Chapek, who was named chief executive in 2020.

In a conference call before the earnings report, analysts said they expected Mr. Chapek to highlight the recent success of the animated musical “Encanto,” which arrived on Disney+ just before the quarter ended. “The Book of Boba Fett,” a limited series set in the “Star Wars” universe, also began rolling out on Disney+ in December, with the company hoping to build on the momentum of “The Mandalorian,” one of the service’s top performers.

Image

Credit…Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

The Securities and Exchange Commission wants to make the private-equity industry less private.

The agency has outlined a series of proposals that could force more transparency into a roughly $18 trillion industry that has long been more opaque and less regulated than other corners of the capital markets.

The proposals advanced on Wednesday would force private funds, including private-equity and hedge funds, to significantly increase their disclosures to the S.E.C. and the industry’s investors, which include wealthy individuals, retirement and pension plans, and university and nonprofit endowments.

Private funds would be required to provide investors with quarterly statements detailing the performance of individual funds, their fees and expenses.

The S.E.C. will now seek public comments on the proposed rules, which are likely to engender significant pushback from an industry with a significant lobbying effort in Washington.

Drew Maloney, president of the American Investment Council, a trade group representing private-equity firms, said the industry supported transparency but had complaints about the commission’s plans.

“We are concerned that these new regulations are unnecessary and will not strengthen pension returns or help companies innovate and compete in a global marketplace,” he said.

In a speech in November, the commission’s chairman, Gary Gensler, said more transparency around fees “could potentially bring greater efficiencies to this important part of the capital markets.”

The proposals would also impose new requirements for record-keeping and audits and limit actions that could give certain investors more preferential treatment. Private fund advisers would also be prohibited from charging certain fees and expenses to a fund.

In a statement, Steve Nelson, chief executive of the Institutional Limited Partners Association, a trade group representing pension funds and other investors, said the rules would “help address the increased conflict of interest in the industry.”

Market participants said it could be the end of the year before any rules became final.

Image

Credit…Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

Emily Flitter

The Securities and Exchange Commission wants to shorten the time it takes to complete a stock trade, a change agency officials believe will reduce market risk, according to a proposal announced on Wednesday.

Right now, there is a two-day window between when a trade is agreed upon between a buyer and a seller and when the money and the stock in question change hands. The S.E.C. is proposing to cut that time in half, to one day.

“As the old saying goes, time is money,” Gary Gensler, the S.E.C. chair, said in a statement emailed to journalists on Wednesday. “Shortening the settlement cycle should reduce the amount of margin that counterparties would need to post with clearinghouses.”

Central clearinghouses are responsible for overseeing trading activity and ensuring that trades are completed and market obligations are met. If a brokerage fails, a central clearing facility is supposed to step in and cover the cost of the mismatched trades.

The S.E.C.’s proposal won’t go into effect yet. The agency will first seek public comment, then can make revisions before the five-member bipartisan commission votes on it.

The move comes a year after retail investors joined forces to buy up shares of GameStop, AMC and other struggling companies that some hedge fund traders had shorted. To short a stock, a trader borrows shares from a broker for a fee and sells them immediately, expecting to buy them back when the share price falls, return them to the broker and pocket the difference. But during last year’s retail mania, demand for individual shares rose well above what market participants expected, causing stock market panic.

Hedge fund traders who had bet that the shares of GameStop and AMC would fall scrambled to find shares of the two companies to cover their bets as the share prices rose instead. Brokerages risked running out of money in the quest to meet obligations to their customers. A few brokerages, most notably Robinhood, had to temporarily stop investors from trading the stocks as a result.

If such an event were to happen again, the S.E.C.’s proposed change would make it more manageable by requiring all stock trades to be completed more quickly. The proposal would force traders and brokerages to identify, in as close to real time as possible, where the money and the stock shares were coming from to fulfill each trade. It would also direct central clearing facilities to start building systems that would eventually allow “fully automatic” trade processing.

Susanne Trimbath, an economist who has studied market structure for decades and who in the 1990s worked for a subsidiary of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, which runs the central clearinghouse for stocks, said that the proposal was a baby step toward the safest possible market structure: near-instantaneous trade clearing.

The corporation’s stock clearing facilities are “systemically important financial market utilities,” Ms. Trimbath said, a term established after the 2008 financial crisis. Federal officials have deemed these institutions crucial to the functioning of financial markets and the economy. This means, according to Ms. Trimbath, that the government might have to support them with taxpayer money if they reach the brink of failure.

The clearing facilities could be destabilized by a large-scale panic caused by too many failed trades, Ms. Trimbath said. Shortening trade times would reduce the risk of that happening, so it would be good for taxpayers, she said.

“If something goes wrong, we don’t want to be in a position to bail them out.”

Image

Credit…Dennizn/Shutterstock

Tiffany HsuKatie Robertson

Six magazines operated by the media mogul Barry Diller through his Dotdash Meredith group will immediately stop publishing in print and move online.

The move, which affects Entertainment Weekly, InStyle, EatingWell, Health, Parents and People en Español, will lead to 200 job cuts, according to a memo sent to employees on Wednesday. The cuts amount to less than 5 percent of the company’s total work force.

The magazines were acquired last year by Dotdash, a subsidiary of Mr. Diller’s InterActiveCorp, when it bought the publishing giant Meredith for roughly $2.7 billion.

“We have said from the beginning, buying Meredith was about buying brands, not magazines or websites,” Neil Vogel, the chief executive of Dotdash Meredith, wrote in the memo, which was obtained by The New York Times. “It is not news to anyone that there has been a pronounced shift in readership and advertising from print to digital, and as a result, for a few important brands, print is no longer serving the brand’s core purpose.”

The online audience for Parents, InStyle and EatingWell increased 40 percent in the last year, according to the memo, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Dotdash Meredith also runs People, Better Homes & Gardens, Food & Wine and other publications that will remain in print. Mr. Vogel said the company planned to invest more than $80 million in content this year and print more than 350 million magazines.

“Today’s step is not a cost savings exercise and it is not about capturing synergies or any other acquisition jargon, it is about embracing the inevitable digital future for the affected brands,” he said in the memo. “Naysayers will interpret this as another nail in print’s coffin. They couldn’t be more wrong — print remains core to Dotdash Meredith.”

When Entertainment Weekly debuted in 1990, critics doubted it would last, and even some employees started an office pool, betting on how many issues it could survive. The bets were capped at 26 issues.

But on Wednesday, tributes to Entertainment Weekly and its long success flooded social media, including recollections of star-studded covers taped inside high school lockers and descriptions of the publication as a pop-culture bible.

Avid readers of InStyle recounted how they maxed out credit cards subscribing to the fashion tome and hauled the magazine with them on moves. The publication, known for showcasing celebrities using a formula it once described as “strapless dress, hand on hip, sellable smile,” was founded in 1994 with Barbra Streisand on its first cover.

The end of the print editions follows a now familiar industry trend: Many magazine companies are looking for ways to cut costs as the circulation of physical copies continues to drop and competition for advertising dollars becomes more fierce. Shape, a women’s fitness magazine owned by Meredith, stopped print editions at the end of last year. In September, the U.S. print version of Marie Claire, owned by the British publisher Future Media, was shuttered. Hearst discontinued regular print editions of O, The Oprah Magazine, in 2020.

Wall Street’s gains extended to a second day on Wednesday. The S&P 500 was up 1.5 percent, and the Nasdaq composite rose 2.1 percent.

Here are the highlights:

  • Chipotle rose 10.1 percent after the company reported on Tuesday that its revenue increased 22 percent, to $2 billion, in the latest quarter compared with the same period the year before. The fast food chain also said that the higher costs of beef and transportation were passed on to consumers without dampening demand.

  • CVS fell about 5.4 percent, even after the company reported stronger-than-expected earnings resulting from coronavirus testing and vaccinations. It cautioned, however, that demand for tests and shots would fall sharply this year.

  • Lyft fell 6.8 percent after the ride hailing company reported it lost $1 billion last year, compared with $1.8 billion in 2020. The company also warned that the Omicron variant would affect its current quarter. Its rival Uber reported after the market closed that its revenue grew to $5.8 billion, an 83 percent increase from the same period a year ago.

  • The gains on Wall Street came a day before another key inflation update. The Consumer Price Index is expected to show on Thursday that prices rose more than 7 percent in January. Inflation is already accelerating at its fastest pace since 1982, and the data will be scrutinized in case it affects the Federal Reserve’s plans to raise interest rates this year in an effort to cool the economy down.

  • Stocks in Europe rose sharply. The Stoxx Europe 600 closed with a 1.7 percent gain on Wednesday.

Image

Credit…Amanda Edwards/Getty Images

John Koblin

Discovery and AT&T cleared a significant regulatory hurdle on Wednesday that put the two companies on a glide path to close a deal to combine Discovery and WarnerMedia in the next two or three months.

The merger “satisfied the closing condition” as part of an antitrust review by the Department of Justice, Discovery said in a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

When closed, the deal will create one of the biggest media companies in the country, combining the assets of HBO, Warner Bros. television and film studios, and the sports-heavy TNT and TBS networks with Discovery’s enormous library of nonfiction programming, which includes Oprah Winfrey’s OWN, HGTV, the Food Network and Animal Planet.

The announcement on Wednesday also means that Discovery and WarnerMedia executives should be able to more deeply engage with one another and conduct more intimate business reviews, which they could not do before clearing the regulatory review.

AT&T faced intense government scrutiny when it purchased Time Warner in October 2016. That deal was fiercely contested by the Justice Department and in limbo for 20 months before finally closing in June 2018.

By comparison, Discovery and AT&T announced their plans to merge assets nine months ago.

In the coming weeks, Discovery will have a shareholder vote, which is widely expected to pass, and will have to begin raising more than $30 billion in debt for the deal.

The Discovery chief executive, David Zaslav, will take over the combined company when the merger is complete, potentially as soon as April.

In the meantime, both companies are still moving independently of each other. Discovery, the owner of Eurosport, is in advanced negotiations to expand its sports business in Britain. And last week, CNN’s president, Jeff Zucker, was forced to resign.

Image

Credit…Sarahbeth Maney/The New York Times

Microsoft on Wednesday kicked off a charm offensive in Washington to gain government approval for its $70 billion deal to buy the video game company Activision Blizzard, saying it would not give preferential treatment to its own games in its app stores.

Satya Nadella, Microsoft’s chief executive, and Brad Smith, its president, said at a news conference in Washington that they planned to meet officials to discuss the deal. Mr. Smith said he had been “sharing where we’re going with members of Congress” and that the company had been “meeting with people in the think tank community and the like.”

Regulators are expected to give Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision — the largest in Microsoft’s history — a tough review. The deal would combine Activision, which has games like Call of Duty and World of Warcraft, with Microsoft’s Xbox operation, which publishes hits like Halo and makes consoles and gaming subscription services.

To get ahead of that scrutiny, Microsoft executives brought a list of promises.

“We are proposing to write the biggest check in the history of Microsoft for $68 billion and will only be permitted to write that check if 17 governments around the world approve that transaction,” Mr. Smith said. “We want to be clear with regulators and with the public that if this acquisition is approved, they can count on Microsoft to adapt to the rules that are emerging.”

Mr. Smith and Mr. Nadella said they would commit to loosening restrictions on how other developers can gain access to Microsoft’s app stores. They said they would also not force other developers to take payments from users using Microsoft’s systems, would allow game developers to talk directly to players and not promote the company’s own games over rival products.

Microsoft has pledged to continue to allow Activision’s major franchises, like Call of Duty, to be available on Sony PlayStation, an Xbox competitor, beyond the company’s current agreement with the company.

The Microsoft executives acknowledged the steep challenge of getting their blockbuster deal approved in a time of increased scrutiny of big tech companies from the Biden administration. Lina Khan, the chair of the Federal Trade Commission, is a critic of tech giants like Amazon and Meta, the parent company of Facebook.

Under her, the agency sued to block chip maker Nvidia’s acquisition of Arm and she has promised to be more aggressive in scrutinizing more mergers and acquisitions. She began a process to toughen standards on so-called vertical mergers, which could include Microsoft’s bid for Activision, a combination of two companies along a supply chain.

Microsoft may also face challenges abroad. Regulators in Britain and the European Union have been even more aggressive in filing antitrust lawsuits against the tech giants or moving to block their acquisitions.

Microsoft has said Activision will help it compete in the nascent business of the so-called metaverse, or virtual worlds where some tech companies believe people could work and play.

Mr. Nadella said the main message was that Microsoft would not dominate gaming if the merger was approved. The company would become the third largest provider of video games with about 13 percent of the market, he said.

“In traditional times, being the number three in a highly fragmented market wouldn’t be that interesting to anyone,” Mr. Nadella said.

Mr. Smith said Microsoft had expressed support for antitrust legislation to show members of Congress that the company would not fight what it viewed as inevitable regulations.

“We are not in the world of 2018 and 2019,” he said. “We recognize there will be more scrutiny of any large accusations made by a large tech company. It behooves us to move quickly and transparently and be clear on how we manage this.”

Image

Credit…Joshua Bessex/Associated Press

Union membership nationwide has tumbled to its lowest in decades, but recent events suggest that the unionization movement in the United States seems to be gaining momentum.

It certainly has support from the Biden administration, which issued a report this week outlining dozens of steps it would take to promote union membership. The DealBook newsletter has rounded up some recent union developments making news:

  • Congressional staff members started a unionization effort last week, noting that they are employed by politicians who say they support the labor movement. Before their workers can unionize, however, House members must pass a resolution allowing it. Representative Andy Levin, Democrat of Michigan, plans to do that this week. President Biden supports the union drive, the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, said Tuesday.

  • Starbucks workers in California this week joined their counterparts in more than 50 locations in 19 states, pushing for union elections after the first company-owned store unionized in Buffalo, N.Y., at the end of last year. On Tuesday, the company fired several employees in Memphis who were seeking to unionize their store, for what the company said were violations of safety and security policies.

  • Amazon faces another union vote at a warehouse in Alabama, after the National Labor Relations Board threw out the results, citing misconduct by the company. A rerun of the vote started last week, and workers at a Staten Island warehouse also recently collected enough signatures to warrant a vote.

  • Media companies are making news for workers’ unionization drives (including at The New York Times). One of the latest is The Financial Times’s U.S. newsroom, Bloomberg News reports.

Despite the recent efforts, union membership is still just above 10 percent of the U.S. work force last year, half the share of the early 1980s. In absolute terms, union rolls have lost about four million members over that period.

Image

Credit…Stephanie Keith for The New York Times

Jeremy W. Peters

James Bennet, the former editorial page editor for The New York Times, is expected to continue testifying on Wednesday in the trial that will determine whether The Times is held liable for defamation in the United States for the first time in at least 50 years.

The Times is being sued by Sarah Palin, the former governor of Alaska, whose legal team tried for most of the day on Tuesday to convince the jury that Mr. Bennet and other Times journalists acted hastily and recklessly in publishing an editorial that falsely linked Ms. Palin’s political rhetoric to a mass shooting.

They are also trying to establish that The Times was slow in appending a correction, which did not name her or offer an apology to Ms. Palin.

They focused on emails between Mr. Bennet and other members of the Times opinion staff to establish a timeline between the publication of the editorial on the night of June 14, 2017, and the addition of the correction the next morning.

The editorial, which lamented the nation’s increasingly heated political discourse, was written after the shooting at a congressional baseball team practice in June 2017 that left Representative Steve Scalise, Republican of Louisiana, gravely wounded. As Mr. Bennet was editing the piece before publication, he inserted an incorrect reference to a 2010 map from Ms. Palin’s political action committee that included illustrations of cross hairs over 20 House districts held by Democrats.

That addition — “the link to political incitement was clear” — asserted that there was a link between the map and the 2011 shooting that critically injured another member of Congress, Gabrielle Giffords, and killed six others in Tucson, Ariz. In fact, such a link was never established.

The Justice Department on Tuesday said it had seized more than $3.6 billion worth of stolen Bitcoin and arrested a married couple, Ilya Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan, accused of laundering the cryptocurrency.

Here’s what you need to know:

It was the department’s largest financial seizure ever. About 119,754 Bitcoin was stolen in 2016 from the Bitfinex exchange, according to prosecutors. (It was worth $71 million at the time of the theft and is now valued at over $4.5 billion.) Law enforcement officials recovered 94,636 Bitcoin, valued at more than $3.6 billion, from a wallet belonging to Mr. Lichtenstein.

“In a futile effort to maintain digital anonymity, the defendants laundered stolen funds through a labyrinth of cryptocurrency transactions,” Lisa O. Monaco, the deputy attorney general, said in a statement. READ THE ARTICLE →

The couple now face charges of money laundering. The pair, who describe themselves as entrepreneurs, led a flashy life. Ms. Morgan in particular has built up an outsize public profile, writing for Forbes and Inc. and rapping under the name Razzlekhan, the self-described “crocodile of Wall Street.”

Image

Credit…Olivier Douliery/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

They posted online often and publicly about crypto: “The amount of spam I’m getting about sketchy crypto get rich stuff really makes me feel like this bubble is gonna pop soon!” Ms. Morgan tweeted in December. READ THE ARTICLE →

Image

Credit…Taylor Glascock for The New York Times

The willingness of people to pay for digital access is giving many publishers hope that they have found a way to survive — and, according to the most optimistic, even thrive.

Publishers have thought for many years that online subscriptions might be the best path back to a level of regular revenue that could support continued investment in their newsrooms. But it has been elusive, Marc Tracy reports for The New York Times.

Many newspapers that first found success emphasizing online subscriptions had national reaches, including The Wall Street Journal (which has had a paywall since 1997) and The New York Times (since 2011).

National or global appeal is not realistic for most local newspapers, which stand to sacrifice loyal readers if they cease covering their core geographic areas intensely. The most ambitious speak of dominating their states.

But the past several years have revealed that by doing well in one’s backyard, one can support a staff large enough to cover it ambitiously:

  • The Los Angeles Times has more than doubled digital subscriptions in the past two years, to 450,000.

  • The Boston Globe, which says it makes enough digital revenue to support its newsroom, increased its digital subscribers in the last two and a half years to 226,000 from 100,000, according to figures provided by the newspaper.

  • The Philadelphia Inquirer’s digital-only subscriptions grew 28 percent last year, to north of 60,000.

“We don’t need to go outside our area to reach a really nice and sustainable piece of profitability,” said Grant Moise, the president and publisher of The Dallas Morning News. With 176 journalists, “The News is at least two times bigger than any TV station, radio station or local competitor,” he added. “We need to own that.”

“Just because print is declining doesn’t mean digital is the salvation,” said one media scholar. READ THE ARTICLE →

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/02/09/business/stock-market-economy-news